哥白尼介绍求关于哥白尼的介绍,要包括他的生平（life）,成就（major achievments）,评论（comment on him）,还有他和文艺复兴的关系~

哥白尼介绍求关于哥白尼的介绍,要包括他的生平（life）,成就（major achievments）,评论（comment on him）,还有他和文艺复兴的关系~
哥白尼介绍
求关于哥白尼的介绍,
要包括他的生平（life）,成就（major achievments）,
评论（comment on him）,还有他和文艺复兴的关系~

哥白尼介绍求关于哥白尼的介绍,要包括他的生平（life）,成就（major achievments）,评论（comment on him）,还有他和文艺复兴的关系~
Polish name: Mikolaj Kopernik. Polish astronomer and mathematician who, as a student, studied canon law, mathematics, and medicine at Cracow, Bologna, Rome, Padua, and Ferrara. Copernicus became interested in astronomy and published an early description of his "heliocentric" model of the solar system in Commentariolus (1512). In this model, the sun was actually not exactly the center of the solar system, but was slightly offset from the center using a device invented by Ptolemy known as the equant point. The idea that the Sun was the center of the solar system was not new (similar theories had been proposed by Aristarchus and Nicholas of Cusa), but Copernicus also worked out his system in full mathematical detail. Even though the mathematics in his description was not any simpler than Ptolemy's, it required fewer basic assumptions. By postulating only the rotation of the Earth, revolution about the sun, and tilt of Earth's rotational axis, Copernicus could explain the observed motion of the heavens. However, because Copernicus retained circular orbits, his system required the inclusion of epicycles. Unfortunately, out of fear that his ideas might get him into trouble with the church, Copernicus delayed publication of them.
In 1539, Copernicus took on Rheticus as a student and handed over his manuscript to him to write a popularization of the heliocentric theory, published as Narratio Prima in 1540. Shortly before his death, Rheticus convinced Copernicus to allow publication of his original manuscript, and De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium was published in 1543. Copernicus proposed his theory as a true description, not just a theory to save appearances. Unlike Buridan and Oresme, he did not think that any theory which saved appearances was valid, instead believing that there could only be a single true theory. When the work was published, however, Andreas Osiander added an unauthorized preface stating that the contents was merely a device to simplify calculations.
Copernicus adapted physics to the demands of astronomy, believing that the principles of Ptolemy's system were incorrect, not the math or observations. He was the first person in history to create a complete and general system, combining mathematics, physics, and cosmology. (Ptolemy, for instance, had treated each planet separately.) Copernicus's system was taught in some universities in the 1500s but had not permeated the academic world until approximately 1600. Some people, among whom John Donne and William Shakespeare were the most influential, feared Copernicus's theory, feeling that it destroyed hierarchal natural order which would in turn destroy social order and bring about chaos. Indeed, some people (such as Bruno), used Copernicus's theory to justify radical theological views.
Before Copernicus formulated his theory of the solar system, astronomy in Europe had stagnated. After the Almagest had been translated into Latin, European astronomers such as the Austrian mathematician Georg von Peurbach and the German astronomer Regiomontanus proposed no new theories, attempting instead to refine the flawed system already laid out by Ptolemy. The astronomy textbook used for teaching was still The Sphere, the same book that had been in use since the 1200s. Rather than formulating new theories, astronomers had busied themselves in "saving appearances," which consisted of trying to patch it up Ptolemy's cumbersome and inaccurate model. Copernicus, however, wiped the slate clean in a single broad stroke, and proposed a fundamentally different model in which the planets all circled the Sun in De Revolutionibus Orbium Coelestium. While radically different from Ptolemy's model, Copernicus's heliocentric theory was hardly an original idea. Similar theories had been proposed by Aristarchus as early as the third century B. C., and Nicholas de Cusa, a German scholar, had independently made the same assertion in a book he published in 1440. We know for a fact that Copernicus was well aware of Aristarchus's priority, since his original draft of De Revolutionibus has survived and features a passage referring to Aristarchus which Copernicus crossed out so as not to compromise the originality of his theory. In his belief that his theory was an accurate description of nature rather than just a mathematical model, Copernicus was therefore not truly revolutionary.
What was a little revolutionary was that Copernicus worked out his system in full mathematical detail in De Revolutionibus. By doing this, Copernicus went a step beyond Ptolemy, de Cusa, and Aristarchus. Ptolemy had regarded his theory as simply a mathematic tool for calculation, having no physical basis. On the other side of the coin, de Cusa and Aristarchus had proposed a purely physical model, not endeavoring to mathematically investigate its consequences. Copernicus's most significant achievement was his combination of mathematics and physics, adapting physics to conform to his view of astronomical truth, with a good bit of cosmology thrown in for good measure.
This achievement alone, however, hardly qualifies as a "revolution." Copernicus offered mathematics which were every bit as entangled as Ptolemy's, and because he retained circular orbits, his system required the inelegant inclusion of epicycles and their accompanying complication. To Copernicus's credit, although his description was not any simpler than Ptolemy's, it did require fewer basic assumptions. In addition, Copernicus's theory explained some problems, such as the reason that Mercury and Venus are only observed close to the Sun (their orbits always kept them nearer the sun than Earth ) and Mars's retrograde motion (the Earth, traveling in its smaller orbit, overtakes Mars, causing Mars to appear to move change direction and move backward relative to distant "fixed" stars). However, like Ptolemy, Copernicus could still not explain variations in the brightness of Venus.
Copernicus was the first person in history to create a complete and general system, combining mathematics, physics, and cosmology. Yet, by themselves Copernicus's achievements, do not constitute a revolution. Copernicus had been motivated to this theory by Neoplatonic and Pythagorean considerations. His reasoning seems to have been predominantly motivated by aesthetics. In his view, equally spaced planets in circular orbits would represent harmony in the universe. But Copernicus had made no observations and stated no general laws. His mathematics could describe the motion of the planets, but his theory was of a very ad hoc nature.
It took the accurate observational work of Brahe, the exhaustive mathematics of Kepler, and the mathematical genius of Newton to take Copernicus's theory as a starting point, and glean from it the underlying truths and laws governing celestial mechanics. Copernicus was an important player in the development of these theories, but his work would likely have likely remained in relative obscurity without the observational work of Brahe. It would have been discarded by the wayside, until subsequent investigation brought it back to light. It is likely, in fact, that given Kepler would have independently arrived at a heliocentric theory just in the process of interpreting Brahe's data, and the scientific revolution would have been born anyway. To a large extent, then, Copernicus has achieved his prominent place in history through what amounted to a lucky, albeit shrewd, guess. It is therefore more appropriate to view Copernicus's achievements as a preliminary step towards scientific revolution, rather than a revolution in itself.
波兰名:哥白尼Mikolaj. 波兰天文学家、数学家,他作为学生学习卡法律、数学、医学、克拉科夫、博洛尼亚、罗马、帕多瓦、Ferrara. 哥白尼天文学产生兴趣,早日出版说明"心"模式在太阳系 Commentariolus (1512). 这一模式的 太阳 其实并非太阳系中心,由中心以弥补略发明的装置 心 称为 Equant点. 以为 太阳 中心的太阳之(已提出类似理论 Aristarchus 尼古拉的大学生和,但他创立并制定全面系统的数学内容. 虽然并没有说明他的数学简单得多 心的 ,要少要点. 只有通过假定的轮换 地球 , 对革命 太阳 , 倾斜,对 地球 轴轮,可以说明哥白尼发现天动议. 不过,由于保留哥白尼圆形轨道,他必须把epicycles系统. 可惜,担心他会想法使他的事情教会哥白尼推迟公布.
在1539年,哥白尼危机 Rheticus 作为学生,他交了手,他写的普及心论出版 看来Narratio 在1540. 他去世前不久, Rheticus 哥白尼使他相信发表原稿, DeRevolutionibusOrbiumCoelestium 1543年出版. 哥白尼提出的理论是正确的说明,不仅使理论出现. 与 Buridan , Oresme 他不相信任何理论,出现了有效,而认为只有一个真正的理论. 在出版工作,AndreasOsiander擅自增加前言说明内容只是手段,简化计算.
哥白尼的要求天文物理调整,认为原则 心的 系统错误,而不是数学和意见. 他是第一个创造历史,完成总系统将数学、物理、宇宙学. ( 心 例如,分别把每个星球). 哥白尼的系统的一些大学教授1500s并未进入学术界之前约16. 有人称赞约翰,其中最有影响的是英国的威廉,恐怕哥白尼理论,认为它破坏自然hierarchal,从而破坏社会秩序,造成混乱. 甚至有人(如 布鲁诺 )用哥白尼的理论来解释根本理论观点.
在哥白尼提出太阳中心论,欧洲天文学停滞. 在 Almagest 译成拉丁文、奥地利等欧洲天文学家数学家乔治冯 Peurbach 德国天文学家和 Regiomontanus 没有提出新的理论,而是努力完善制度,制定了错误 心 . 天文教学课本还是 领域 ,这本书中所使用的自1200s. 而不是制定新的理论、天文学家已经忙自己"拯救亮相,其中包括设法补起来 心的 麻烦和错误示范. 哥白尼,丧失了一个大过,不干净,提出了根本变化,地球上所有的模式盘旋 太阳 在 DeRevolutionibusOrbiumCoelestium. 而迥异 心的 模型、哥白尼的理论几乎没有一个心本意. 已提出类似理论 Aristarchus 早在公元前三世纪,体育局取消,德国学者中提出同样主张独立成书于1440年发表. 我们所知道的是,天知道 Aristarchus的 优先,原草案 DeRevolutionibus 渡过一段内容,指 Aristarchus 哥白尼,以免交叉影响,他的理论创新. 他认为,他的理论是正确的,而非描述性的数学模型,因此并未真正哥白尼革命.
什么是小革命是哥白尼制定全面系统的数学细节 revolutionibusde. 对此,关进了超越 心 ,取消体育、 Aristarchus . 他已经把心之论的数学计算工具,并没有实际的. 在另一方面,在体育和 Aristarchus 建议纯物理模型,其结果不致力于数学研究. 哥白尼的最大成就是他综合数学、物理、应用物理,他认为天文学符合事实,好一点的好,学医.
这一成绩仅限定几乎是"革命". 哥白尼数学所提供不亚于错综复杂 心的 ,因为保留循环的轨道,其制度规定不够配套,将epicycles复杂. 在哥白尼的贷款,但他没有说明是不是简单 心的 ,确需减少的基本设想. 此外,哥白尼的理论解释一些问题,例如,因为 水星 , 金星 只看到接近 太阳 (永远的轨道接近太阳比留 地球 和 火星的 落后的议案( 地球 , 旅行小轨道超越 火星 , 令 火星 出现倒退,提出改革的方向与远"固定"星星. 但如 心 ,也不能说明关亮度的变化 金星 .
哥白尼是历史上最早建立全面彻底的系统将数学、物理、宇宙学. 但哥白尼自己的成就,不是革命. 哥白尼是这一理论的自觉,Neoplatonic 定理 考虑. 其主要理由似乎是出于美学. 他认为,地球的圆形轨道间隔同样将是宇宙和谐. 但哥白尼未表示任何意见,一般规律. 他可以说数学的议案 地球 , 但他的理论是一个非常特别的.
它把准确监测工作 Brahe ,详细的数学 本片 和数学天才 牛顿 采取哥白尼的理论为起点,从搜集的基本原理和规律,天体力学. 哥白尼是一个重要的角色,这些理论的发展,工作仍然可能会有比较模糊的观测工作,而 Brahe . 就被丢弃在路旁,在调查后发现带回. 很可能实际上,由于 本片 有独立心论达成刚开始使用 Brahe的 数据和科学革命诞生了. 在很大程度上,再关他取得突出地位相当于一个历史的幸运,但精明,估计. 因此,比较适合哥白尼的科学成果为革命的第一步,而不是革命本身.